DBScholar

Back to papers

Characterizing Schema Mappings via Data Examples

Summary: Identifies which s-t tgds are uniquely determined by finite data examples: positive/negative examples fail, whereas finite universal examples (source+universal solution) equate to existence of an Armstrong basis. LAV and n‑modular classes are characterizable; some GAV mappings are not. (summarized by gpt-5-mini on Feb 09 2026)

Paper ID
1524
Venue
PODS
Year
2010
Pagerank
8.93781e-05
Overall Rank
2,215 | 84.81%
DOI
10.1145/1807085.1807120

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

Authors

BibTeX Citation

@inproceedings{alexe_pods10,
        address = {New York, NY, USA},
        series = {{PODS} '10},
        title = {{Characterizing Schema Mappings via Data Examples}},
        url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1807085.1807120},
        doi = {10.1145/1807085.1807120},
        booktitle = {Proceedings of the {ACM} {SIGMOD} Symposium on {Principles} of {Database} {Systems}},
        publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
        author = {Alexe, Bogdan and Kolaitis, Phokion G. and Tan, Wang-Chiew},
        year = {2010}
}

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 15 of 15 citing papers.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 8 of 8 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers