Performance Evaluation of Two Concurrency Control Mechanisms in a Distributed Database System
Summary: Direct comparison of SDD-1 and Dynamic Timestamping via simulation, focusing on protocol sync delays and transaction latency. Regression links I/O and comm delays; tests exponential/erlang fits for delay distributions. (summarized by gpt-5-nano on Feb 09 2026)
Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time
No non-self incoming citations found for this paper in this database.
Authors
Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 1 of 1 citing papers.
| Rank | Citing Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,563 | Basic Timestamp, Multiple Version Timestamp, and Two-Phase Locking | 1983 | VLDB | 0.00011352203 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next
Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 1 of 1 cited papers.
Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.
| Rank | Cited Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 828 | Queueing Network Models for Concurrent Transaction Processing in a Database System | 1979 | SIGMOD | 0.00016189544 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next