DBScholar

Back to papers

Empirical Comparison of Database Concurrency Control Schemes

Summary: Empirically compares classical locking, two-version protocols, and optimistic concurrency control on six real DBMS workloads (60 MB–2.9 GB). A unified metric captures blocking and re-execution overhead, revealing results that overturn qualitative expectations. (summarized by gpt-5.6-luna on Jul 24 2026)

Paper ID
7777
Venue
VLDB
Year
1983
Pagerank
8.4562631e-05
Overall Rank
2,533 | 82.63%
DOI
-

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

Authors

BibTeX Citation

@article{peinl_vldb83,
        title = {{Empirical Comparison of Database Concurrency Control Schemes}},
        author = {Peinl, Peter and Reuter, Andreas},
        journal = {PVLDB},
        series = {{VLDB} '83},
        pages = {97},
        year = {1983}
}

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 3 of 3 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Rank Cited Paper Year Venue Pagerank
1,471 A Study of the Effects of Locking Granularity in a Data Base Management System 1977 SIGMOD 0.00010671012
4,580 Concurrency on High-Traffic Data Elements 1982 PODS 6.6202221e-05
4,874 A Quantitative Comparison of Lock Protocols for Centralized Databases 1983 VLDB 6.4690211e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers