Database Paper Browser

Back to papers

The Complexity Of Ordering Subgoals

Summary: Shows that finding a feasible evaluation order for subgoals in a logical rule is inherently exponential-time. Proof establishes an exponential lower bound by reduction from linear-space alternating Turing-machine recognition, avoiding ordinary TM encodings. (summarized by gpt-5-mini on Feb 09 2026)

Paper ID
817
Venue
PODS
Year
1988
Pagerank
9.3375092e-05
Overall Rank
2,187 | 84.79%
DOI
-

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

Authors

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

Rank Citing Paper Year Venue Pagerank
729 An Algorithm For Ordering Subgoals In Nail! 1988 PODS 0.00017483521
3,065 Processing First-Order Queries under Limited Access Patterns 2004 PODS 7.6230903e-05
8,937 Efficiently Ordering Subgoals with Access Constraints [Extended Abstract] 2006 PODS 4.427232e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 2 of 2 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Rank Cited Paper Year Venue Pagerank
16 MAGIC SETS AND OTHER STRANGE WAYS TO IMPLEMENT LOGIC PROGRAMS (Extended Abstract) 1986 PODS 0.0010066783
729 An Algorithm For Ordering Subgoals In Nail! 1988 PODS 0.00017483521
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers