The Complexity Of Ordering Subgoals
Summary: Shows that finding a feasible evaluation order for subgoals in a logical rule is inherently exponential-time. Proof establishes an exponential lower bound by reduction from linear-space alternating Turing-machine recognition, avoiding ordinary TM encodings. (summarized by gpt-5-mini on Feb 09 2026)
Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time
Authors
Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.
| Rank | Citing Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 729 | An Algorithm For Ordering Subgoals In Nail! | 1988 | PODS | 0.00017483521 |
| 3,065 | Processing First-Order Queries under Limited Access Patterns | 2004 | PODS | 7.6230903e-05 |
| 8,937 | Efficiently Ordering Subgoals with Access Constraints [Extended Abstract] | 2006 | PODS | 4.427232e-05 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next
Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 2 of 2 cited papers.
Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.
| Rank | Cited Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | MAGIC SETS AND OTHER STRANGE WAYS TO IMPLEMENT LOGIC PROGRAMS (Extended Abstract) | 1986 | PODS | 0.0010066783 |
| 729 | An Algorithm For Ordering Subgoals In Nail! | 1988 | PODS | 0.00017483521 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next