DBScholar

Back to papers

How and Why False Denial Constraints are Discovered

Summary: Show SOTA denial-constraint discovery yields mostly false constraints (false rate often >95%), tracing the issue to the standard DC validity definition. Propose a statistical redefinition of DC validity that prevents false positives, recovers true constraints missed by experts, and provides curated golden DC sets. (summarized by gpt-5-mini on Feb 09 2026)

Paper ID
h0b38014634e137fc
Venue
VLDB
Year
2025
Pagerank
4.9793485e-05
Overall Rank
11,319 | 23.90%
DOI
10.14778/3748191.3748209

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

No non-self incoming citations found for this paper in this database.

Authors

BibTeX Citation

@article{martin_vldb25,
        title = {{How and Why False Denial Constraints are Discovered}},
        author = {Martin, Albert and de Almeida, Eduardo C. and Romero, Oscar and Queralt, Anna},
        journal = {PVLDB},
        series = {{VLDB} '25},
        volume = {18},
        number = {10},
        pages = {3477--3489},
        doi = {10.14778/3748191.3748209},
        url = {https://doi.org/10.14778/3748191.3748209},
        year = {2025}
}

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

Rank Citing Paper Year Venue Pagerank
10,439 Discovery of Denial Constraints with Hardware Acceleration 2026 SIGMOD 4.9793485e-05
10,771 Discovering Approximate Denial Constraints in Large Databases 2026 VLDB 4.9793485e-05
11,006 LIMA: Denial Constraint Discovery in Large Dynamic Databases 2026 VLDB 4.9793485e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 15 of 15 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers