Database Paper Browser

Back to papers

The Importance of Being Expert: Efficient Max-Finding in Crowdsourcing

Summary: Two-class crowdsourcing model (experts vs. naive) with a threshold error framework for evaluating accuracy-cost tradeoffs. Proposes a max-finding algorithm achieving a constant-factor approximation with expert and naive workers, and tight upper/lower bounds, validated on CrowdFlower data. (summarized by gpt-5-nano on Feb 09 2026)

Paper ID
4942
Venue
SIGMOD
Year
2015
Pagerank
4.1945683e-05
Overall Rank
11,902 | 17.20%
DOI
10.1145/2723372.2723722

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

No non-self incoming citations found for this paper in this database.

Authors

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 0 of 0 citing papers.

Rank Citing Paper Year Venue Pagerank
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 7 of 7 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Rank Cited Paper Year Venue Pagerank
94 CrowdDB: Answering Queries with Crowdsourcing 2011 SIGMOD 0.00051013264
249 Crowdsourced Databases: Query Processing with People 2011 CIDR 0.00030740523
267 Human-powered Sorts and Joins 2012 VLDB 0.00029690405
859 So Who Won? Dynamic Max Discovery with the Crowd 2012 SIGMOD 0.00015870894
1,164 CrowdScreen: Algorithms for Filtering Data with Humans 2012 SIGMOD 0.00013564823
4,479 Optimal Crowd-Powered Rating and Filtering Algorithms 2014 VLDB 6.149053e-05
4,651 Whom to Ask? Jury Selection for Decision Making Tasks on Micro-blog Services 2012 VLDB 6.022931e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers