DBScholar

Back to papers

Basic Timestamp, Multiple Version Timestamp, and Two-Phase Locking

Summary: Simulation compares Basic Timestamp, Multiple-Version Timestamp, and Two-Phase Locking, finding only marginal gains from multiversioning over basic timestamps. Timestamp schemes win for small transactions; 2PL wins as transaction size grows. (summarized by gpt-5.6-luna on Jul 24 2026)

Paper ID
7778
Venue
VLDB
Year
1983
Pagerank
9.2211825e-05
Overall Rank
2,072 | 85.79%
DOI
-

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

Authors

BibTeX Citation

@article{lin_vldb83,
        title = {{Basic Timestamp, Multiple Version Timestamp, and Two-Phase Locking}},
        author = {Lin, Wen-Te K. and Nolte, Jerry},
        journal = {PVLDB},
        series = {{VLDB} '83},
        year = {1983}
}

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 4 of 4 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Rank Cited Paper Year Venue Pagerank
405 Distributed Database Concurrency Controls Using Before-Values 1981 SIGMOD 0.00019061195
695 An Optimality Theory of Concurrency Control for Databases 1979 SIGMOD 0.00014910218
5,994 On the Power of Locking 1981 SIGMOD 6.0157542e-05
13,270 Performance Evaluation of Two Concurrency Control Mechanisms in a Distributed Database System 1981 SIGMOD 5.093636e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers