Performance Evaluation of an Operating System Transaction Manager
Summary: Direct performance comparison of an OS-level transaction manager and a DBMS transaction manager, with modeled concurrency control and crash recovery across varied simulations. Results show OS-level TM incurs severe performance penalties and is feasible only in specialized circumstances. (summarized by gpt-5-nano on Feb 09 2026)
Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time
No non-self incoming citations found for this paper in this database.
Authors
Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 1 of 1 citing papers.
| Rank | Citing Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,016 | Transaction Support in Read Optimized and Write Optimized File Systems | 1990 | VLDB | 4.8603961e-05 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next
Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)
Showing 4 of 4 cited papers.
Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.
| Rank | Cited Paper | Year | Venue | Pagerank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 190 | Models for Studying Concurrency Control Performance: Alternatives and Implications | 1985 | SIGMOD | 0.0003579699 |
| 1,563 | Basic Timestamp, Multiple Version Timestamp, and Two-Phase Locking | 1983 | VLDB | 0.00011352203 |
| 2,950 | The Performance Of Concurrency Control Algorithms For Database Management Systems | 1984 | VLDB | 7.8329866e-05 |
| 3,109 | Choice and Performance in Locking for Databases | 1984 | VLDB | 7.5489619e-05 |
Previous
Page 1 / 1
Next