Database Paper Browser

Back to papers

The Necessary Death of the Block Device Interface

Summary: Shows the block-device abstraction is untenable for modern SSDs—heterogeneous chip semantics (erase-before-write, page vs byte addressability), extreme parallelism and low latency break block-level performance models. Calls for radical DB–OS–SSD co-design exposing device semantics and parallelism to restore predictable, high-throughput storage for DBMSs. (summarized by gpt-5-mini on Feb 09 2026)

Paper ID
215
Venue
CIDR
Year
2013
Pagerank
5.5269076e-05
Overall Rank
5,403 | 62.42%
DOI
-

Incoming Non-self Citations Over Time

Authors

Incoming Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers.

Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Outgoing Citations (Sorted by Pagerank)

Showing 7 of 7 cited papers.

Citations counted here include only citations to other VLDB/SIGMOD/CIDR/PODS papers in this database.

Rank Cited Paper Year Venue Pagerank
576 Rethinking Database Algorithms for Phase Change Memory 2011 CIDR 0.00019865648
1,295 uFLIP: Understanding Flash IO Patterns 2009 CIDR 0.00012758832
2,328 A Case for Staged Database Systems 2003 CIDR 9.0225171e-05
7,359 Flash Device Support for Database Management 2011 CIDR 4.7528833e-05
7,514 System Co-Design and Data Management for Flash Devices 2011 VLDB 4.7180617e-05
7,518 Getting Priorities Straight: Improving Linux Support for Database I/O 2005 VLDB 4.7180617e-05
12,245 Performing Sound Flash Device Measurements: Some Lessons from uFLIP 2010 SIGMOD 4.1945683e-05
Previous Page 1 / 1 Next

Semantically Similar Papers